We always calc a mix if one is present. Sometimes they drive an over-discharge 
that increases demand, sometimes they don't. Be sure to try every combination 
(4+0, 3+1, 2+2, 1+3, 0+4).

We have even found that calculating a 4-line group that crosses 2 systems can 
create a higher demand if you pressure balance them at the riser. I don't know 
if it is technically a requirement to do that, but it seemed like a good idea.

As Travis mentioned - it can be much easier to just split the systems at the 
k-factor change. It just depends on how much material can be saved vs how much 
the design time will cost.

Matt 


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 9:18 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Kyle.Montgomery <kmontgom...@aerofire.com>; Jamie Seidl 
<jamie.se...@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mixing ESFR Sprinklers

How do you guys calc these systems? Just the K22 section and the K17 section 
separately? Or a combo? I think there are situations where having one line of 
K17s (at 52 psi) in your remote area would be the "worst-case" scenario because 
that 52 psi would drive some overflow in the two lines of K22s (that only need 
40 psi at that height). Or do you actually split the systems (zone boundaries) 
so that there isn't a system that has both types?

-Kyle M

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Jamie Seidl via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2021 3:48 PM
To: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Jamie Seidl <jamie.se...@gmail.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mixing ESFR Sprinklers

Yep, typically end up with K22's down the center at the peak, with a K17 
sandwich to the outside.
Jamie Seidl

On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 1:41 PM Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum < 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:

> Here is the situation:
>
> Building has 40'-8" Maximum Ceiling height at the ridge, the building 
> is designed with K16.8 ESFR's.
>
> Can the areas that are over the 40'-0" maximum ceiling height be 
> designed using K22.4 or K25.2 ESFR's and be approved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Hairfield
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cg
> i/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!Ba8_KKAT!a7NwbGit-6dyv1Yq8Jg4tE
> ZyjB-DjWMrCPViH_HpelfxKczficVerWb6qDNJu50YskU$
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!Ba8_KKAT!a7NwbGit-6dyv1Yq8Jg4tEZyjB-DjWMrCPViH_HpelfxKczficVerWb6qDNJu50YskU$
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,IOrAbg4P-PYiyesETXEEkcTYQi7t_OaVQxx6Dc4UqAFvHGTpfrF6_tWviQcn961DYnjMXrTuNXUzmoiJR1_7eqTYZ-JQMXv4rsFu_IHhmr1GDQ,,&typo=1
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to