I’ve had AHJ’s call me out for not picking the more obvious fire scenario, but 
I stick to the most demanding and then your bases are covered.

It’s not a start at the most demanding sprinkler and then pick up the ones 
closest to it. It’s the group of 4 sprinklers that produce the greatest 
hydraulic demand.


Taylor Schumacher

From: Brett Peters <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:41 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Residential Design in NFPA 13


Caution: This email originated from outside your organization. Please take care 
when clicking links or opening attachments.


This is my thought, so if the area ends up being the master bedroom and there 
is one line that feeds the bedroom, closet and ensuite and another line that 
feeds living area sprinklers, if the master bedroom is the hydraulically most 
demanding space then the adjacent sprinklers would be the closet and ensuite, 
this is both the most likely "next sprinklers to activate as well as flowing 
the 3 heads on one line would be more demanding from a pressure loss 
standpoint, this other "company" is calculating the heads in the living space 
and usually ending up with the 4 heads being from 3 separate lines.
I'm saying his system is underdesigned and doesn't represent the "hydraulically 
most demanding sprinklers" and he is saying that my way is over designed.

Are we spending too much money on our design (material costs) or is he opening 
himself up to a liability issue?

Trying to determine which is actually the "right" way to design the system as 
there are cost implications.

I will be on Holidays from August 12th to 21st, returning to work on Tuesday 
August 22nd

Thanks

Brett Peters
General Manager Installation & Design
Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
780 490 7602 office ext 202
780 490 7605 fax
780 777 0568 cell
780 718 2676 24h
Visit us at www.proudline.ca<http://www.proudline.ca/>

Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for more information



[Image removed by sender.] [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by 
sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image 
removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]


On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:22 AM Greg McGahan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The intent is to calculate the 4 most demanding sprinklers that would activate 
in a single fire event, therefore we tend to submit the version that reflects 
that scenario but we typically prove the calcs for our sake.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:07 AM Brett Peters 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
LOL, unfortunately I have someone arguing that it can be done the other way 
because "those heads have a larger area of coverage".
In my opinion they are twisting the definitions of "adjacent" and 
"hydraulically most demanding" to include the sprinklers that cover the largest 
area but in my opinion the largest floor space doesn't necessarily present as 
the most demanding.

I will be on Holidays from August 12th to 21st, returning to work on Tuesday 
August 22nd

Thanks

Brett Peters
General Manager Installation & Design
Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
780 490 7602 office ext 202
780 490 7605 fax
780 777 0568 cell
780 718 2676 24h
Visit us at www.proudline.ca<http://www.proudline.ca/>

Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for more information



[Image removed by sender.] [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by 
sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image 
removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]


On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 9:31 AM Chris Dorn 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Brett,
I think you answered your own question. “I always choose whatever gives me the 
greatest pressure loss not necessarily the larger flow.” Wouldn’t that by 
definition be the hydraulically most demanding area regardless of location? 
It’s exactly what I do also in this situation.
Chris Dorn



From: Brett Peters <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:15 AM
To: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Residential Design in NFPA 13

Having a debate on which sprinklers actually have to be part of the hydraulic 
calculation in a residential unit in a 13 building (So the calculation has to 
include 4 sprinklers) - NFPA 13, 2013

11.3.1.1* The design area shall be the area that includes the four adjacent 
sprinklers that produce
the greatest hydraulic demand.

With 11.3.1.1 in mind if you have a space where you have less than 4 sprinklers 
in a compartment and you have to start adding sprinklers in other compartments 
to come up with 4 in the calculation, what is the method that you have to use?
So for arguments sake this scenario is 2 sprinklers in one compartment and then 
two "adjacent" sprinklers outside of that compartment but there are sprinklers 
in different directions that can be considered as "adjacent"

  1.  Adding sprinklers from the next compartment on a different sprinkler line 
which would qualify as an "adjacent sprinkler" and potentially have 4 
sprinklers fed form 3 different lines or
  2.  adding "adjacent sprinklers" that are first on a common sprinkler line 
and potentially having 3 sprinklers on a single line.
My argument is that scenario 2 has to be followed as that would produce the 
largest demand to a sprinkler line and if required increase the size of that 
line.
The other argument is that in scenario 1 they are picking the "adjacent 
sprinkler" that has a larger protection area, so the actual water flow might be 
slightly higher but it spreads the flow through 3 different lines instead of 
only 2

So scenario 1 has more flow but less pressure loss resulting in smaller piping 
and scenario 2 has less flow but more pressure loss requiring larger pipe to be 
installed.

So what are other people doing in these situations and what is really 
considered as producing the greatest hydraulic demand? I always choose whatever 
gives me the greatest pressure loss not necessarily the larger flow.

I will be on Holidays from August 12th to 21st, returning to work on Tuesday 
August 22nd

Thanks

Brett Peters
General Manager Installation & Design
Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
780 490 7602 office ext 202
780 490 7605 fax
780 777 0568 cell
780 718 2676 24h
Visit us at www.proudline.ca<http://www.proudline.ca/>

Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for more information



[Image removed by sender.] [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by 
sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image 
removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]  [Image removed by sender.]

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


--
Greg McGahan
Genesis Fire Services, LLC
4912 Glover Lane. Milton, FL 32570
P- 850-637-8535
C- 850-712-9555

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to