Can you explain your reasoning for this conclusion? Why is this code there if you still have to use the obstruction rules? I'm interested in knowing if I've been interpreting this wrong.
Anthony On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:35 AM Ed Kramer <[email protected]> wrote: > Brain cramp or not, you are correct. > > > > Ed K > > > > *From:* Brian Harris <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 28, 2025 7:54 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Ceiling Obstructions > > > > Having a brain cramp this morning.. > > (NFPA13 / 2013) There’s got to be more to Fig 8.6.4.1.1.3(b) with regard > to ceiling height changes. For example, what if the head (blue arrow) is > only a foot off the ceiling height change? I assume 8.6.5.1.2 would have to > come into play as well? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > *Brian Harris, CET* > > BVS Systems Inc. > > bvssystemsinc.com > > Phone: 704.896.9989 > > Fax: 704.896.1935 > > > > _________________________________________________________ > SprinklerForum mailing list: > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > [email protected] >
_________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum mailing list: https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
