New update: On Dec 3, 9:43 am, Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]> wrote: > > Following some critical regressions introduced accidently in releases > > v2.1.3 and v2.1.4 (the second one was intended to fix regressions in > > the first one but that did not work as expected...), I've decided to > > slow down things and move back to v2.1.2 as the current stable > > release. > > > There is currently one critical issue with v2.1.4: > >http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=857 > > > Possibly this one is also related to the regression introduced in > > v2.1.3 regarding IPython support: > >http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=858 > > Issues #857 and #858 seem to be related and are being taking care of. > Thanks to a very detailed bug report, we should be able to fix this > very soon.
This is done. > > And there is also this one which is not critical but kind of annoying > > in terms of usability: > >http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=740 > > This one is fixed. So, AFAIK, there is no other critical issue: the source code is ready for v2.1.5 release (after a few days of beta-testing). -Pierre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
