On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Jed Ludlow <[email protected]> wrote: > A minor modification in the workflow would I think produce the > result we are looking for without all the overhead of switching hosting and > all the associated loss of history that would occur.
Just to be clear, there is no reason there should be any loss of history. There are tools to export mercurial repositories to git with the full history maintained. See fast-export: http://repo.or.cz/w/fast-export.git This tool is even recommened by googlecode for converting googlecode mercural repos to googlecode git repos. It is also possible to use googlecode with git, but I don't know how that compares to github. -Todd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
