Absolutely, and sorry if there was any confusion in my last post. We're just talking about keyboard shortcuts and no more. This is just to help people with their muscle memory :-)

Cheers,
Carlos

El 05/11/14 a las 19:30, Steven Silvester escribió:
I'm expressly *not* signing up to implement a full emacs emulator, including a kill ring, etc. I had merely added a few extra commands for line navigation, the ability to override C-a, and a simple way to toggle between the default keybindings and whichever emacs ones were implemented. C-x-a and C-x-f could be included in that toggle.

Regards,
Steve

—
Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>


On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Great! What do you mean by basic navigation commands? What about
    C-x-s, C-x-f and friends? Not to put pressure on you but I think
    we couldn't announce Emacs keybindings without those, don't you
    think? :-)

    I hope to see your PR soon because I'm an Emacs user myself
    (although being introduced to computers with Win 95, I have to run
    it in cua mode :-)

    Cheers,
    Carlos

    El 05/11/14 a las 17:04, Steven Silvester escribió:
    I'd love to get this included in 2.4.  It would only include the
    basic navigation commands to start (essentially what you'd get at
    a bash command line).

    Regards,
    Steve

    On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 5:06:45 PM UTC-6, Carlos Córdoba wrote:

        Hi,

        Sorry to give you bad news. I refactored our shortcuts
        support, so it should be far more easier to introduce a full
        set of new keybindings, but there hasn't been any progress on
        this so far.

        I think Steven Sylvester was working on this some time ago.
        Steven, do you have time to resume your work and send a pull
        request for 2.4?

        Cheers,
        Carlos

        El 04/11/14 a las 13:49, Diego Fernandez escribió:
        Hey Carlos,

        Any development on this? I'd really like to see this as
        well... it's pretty hard to work on spyder without this, but
        I love many of the other features!

        On Friday, February 14, 2014 10:20:37 AM UTC-5, Carlos
        Córdoba wrote:

            Hi,

            I'm currently refactoring our shortcuts machinery, which
            will let us
            easily add new shortcut schemes in the near future
            (2.3.1 or 2.3.2). But
            right now we don't have support for Emacs/Vim keybindings.

            Cheers,
            Carlos

            El 14/02/14 09:49, GaryP escribió:
            > I saw a post in another forum (I think it was the
            Anaconda forum)
            > suggesting that v. 2.3 might have Emacs keybindings.
             I downloaded 2.3
            > beta, but can't find them.  Do they exist in 2.3, and
            if so, how do I
            > enable them.
            >
            > Simple emacs keybindings (beginning of line,  kill to
            end of line, up
            > line, down line, etc)  is important to me.  I have
            over 20 years of
            > muscle memory that I don't want to bother changing.
            >
            > -gary
            > --
            > You received this message because you are subscribed
            to the Google
            > Groups "spyder" group.
            > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
            emails from it, send
            > an email to [email protected].
            > To post to this group, send email to
            [email protected].
            > Visit this group at
            http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
            > For more options, visit
            https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "spyder" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to [email protected].
        To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
        Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "spyder" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
    the Google Groups "spyder" group.
    To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/spyderlib/P4tmHqrLdGw/unsubscribe.
    To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
    to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to