I have 3 tables in my clients SQL Server 2k instance:

> Products
        :Columns of importance:
         Products.Manufacturer
         Products.PartNumber
> ProductsOverride
        :Columns of importance:
         ProductsOverride.ManufacturerCode
         ProductsOverride.Cost
         ProductsOverride.PartNumber
> ManufacturerCodes
        :Columns of importance:
         ManufacturerCodes.Code
         ManufacturerCodes.Manufacturer

Somehow I have to retrieve the ProductsOverride.Cost value for the given 
PartNumber (which is entered in a search form field), using
the Products.Manufacturer column against the ManufacturerCodes.Manufacturer to 
get the ProductsOverride.Cost. The correlation to
ProductsOverride is the ManufacturerCodes.Code and the 
ProductsOverride.ManufacturerCode.

Gosh I just confused myself more.

Anyone have any ideas? If I am not being clear, which I am almost positive I am 
not, please let me know what I can do to work thru
this.

Thanks,
Brad




-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 2:49 PM
To: SQL
Subject: Re: speed?


:hmm:  I was unaware.

  In that case, why use views at all?

At 04:08 PM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
>Views are slower than regular lookups - only slightly but enough to notice.
>
>
>Quoting Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >   I think you said SQL Server, so why not create a view that pre-selects
> > those 7 columns?  I suspect that will alleviate any performance concerns
> > you may have.
> >
> >   Generally when developing databases, I try to keep database design to
> > what is "logically" correct.  So, a table w/ 82 columns does not
> inherently
> > mean (to me) that the design is bad.
> >
> >
> > At 10:41 AM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
> > >So to sum up, the rows would effect the speed, but not the columns.  Is
> > >that it?
> > >
> > >The reason I asked is because we have one table of 82 columns and we only
> > >work with 7 columns.  To me that is just bad database design. So I
> thought
> > >it would be better if we split the table into two: one with the 7 columns
> > >we need and the other with 75 columns we don't every query, but since
> > >speed is not the factor, I don't really have good reasons to ask my boss
> > >to split it.
> > >
> > >Johnny
> > >
> > >
> > > > As with many things in the DBMS world, the answer is, "Maybe.  It
> > > > depends."
> > > > The primary things that will affect your performance are the row size,
> > > > the
> > > > datatypes involved, and the indexing you have in place.  Secondary to
> > > > that
> > > > will be hardware - things like the amount of memory and type of disk
> > > > storage.  However, I doubt very much that you will see a performance
> > > > difference of 2x no matter what you try.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Eric
> > > > _____________________
> > > > "Once the game is over, the King and the pawn go back in the same box.
> > > > "
> > > > --  Italian proverb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > "Johnny
> > > Le"
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       "SQL"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > >
> > > > >                        cc:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Subject:  speed?
> > >
> > > > 04/22/2005
> > > 09:53
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > AM
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Please respond
> > > to
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > sql
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Does the number of columns in a table effect the performance?  For
> > > > example,
> > > > I want to select 7 fields and 100 rows of a 7 column table with
> >
> > > > millions of
> > > > rows.  Will that be faster than if I select 7 fields and 100 rows of
> > > > an 82
> > > > column table with millions of rows?  So 7 vs. 82 columns.  All other
> > > > factors remain the same.  I am using MS SQL Server 2000.  I would
> > > > think it
> > > > is faster.  What do you think? If it is indeed faster, how much faster
> > > > are
> > > > we talking about here? double or tripple the speed?
> > > >
> > > > Johnny
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:6:2246
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/6
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:6
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.6
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to