On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:23:11PM -0500, Mike Bayer wrote: > if you change your naming convention, then that would show up as a bunch > of brand new constraints in the model and a whole bunch of constraints > removed in the model, so in theory would produce a lot of add constraint > / drop constraint instructions.
Thanks for your reply Mike! I probably didn't explain my steps very clearly, but what I was trying to achieve was basically what you state above. And if I run a test, changing my foreign key naming convention from: "fk": "fk_%(table_name)s_%(column_0_name)s", to "fk": "fkk_%(table_name)s_%(column_0_name)s", ^^^ I get no changes in the autogenerate script at all. And when I say changes, for constraints, I am indeed expecting drop/add, as you explained. Thanks, - Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy-alembic" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy-alembic+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.