| it doesnt rely on rowids heavily, they are only used as the best guess for ordering when selecting...they can also be disabled on a per-mapper basis, and the code that determines what the OID column is can be changed to return a primary key column instead, as it does with MySQL. How would you want it to order elements, when you load the related elements on a many-to-many relationship ? That was the main point of trying to find an "oid", since it gives "insert order" even to an association table that doesnt have a primary key. On Dec 31, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
|
- [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Jonathan Ellis
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Michael Bayer
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Jonathan Ellis
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Michael Bayer
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Michael Bayer
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Jonathan Ellis
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Michael Bayer
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid deprecation Jonathan Ellis
- Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] PG oid depreca... Michael Bayer

