On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Ed Suominen wrote:
I don't think having a table without a primary key is a strawman use
case at all, and agree that SA should be able to handle it. I suspect
that a lot of people fall back on just having an 'ID' Integer field
and
primary key, which they tend to then totally ignore. I think that's
counterproductive, optimizing for a case that never occurs.
i think its a rarer case than you think if you are mapping objects to
rows (or creating relationships)...primary keys are really, really
important. i couldnt imagine a schema that didnt have them for every
represented concept (which Id want to use....).
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
