Florian Boesch wrote: > > Now why would I get so incredibly pissed at this caching issue. Well, it's > because Michael to my understanding basically told me in one go that I'm a > stupid fuckwitt and that I have no business "sneaking" database updates > past > his mapping code. That ah, did me in for.
wow i never said that at all. i have learned that in these online forum kind of worlds, you *really* have to read carefully what you are responding to...especially if youre starting to get emotional. I am a veteran loser-of-cool in online communities, even quite recently to those who saw it happen (not in this forum)....i know all about the "reaction" phase. I didnt say you shouldnt use raw SQL; you can totally use raw SQL, but you should also tell the ORM to expire the apporpriate objects if youre doing so, so that it knows those have been changed behind its back. if you are issuing SQL, you should not expect the ORM to automatically detect that...and also shouldnt expect the ORM to work in such a way that assumes this technique is being used, since thats not the "default" use case for it. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
