Nice. And the tests pass. So it looks like this now:
def _col_aggregate(self, col, func):
"""executes func() function against the given column"""
s1 = sql.select([col], self._clause, **self._ops).alias('u')
return sql.select([func(s1.corresponding_column(col))]).scalar()
def min(self, col):
"""executes the SQL min() function against the given column"""
return self._col_aggregate(col, sql.func.min)
def max(self, col) ...
See anything wrong with this or some disadvantage compared to the
current SelectResults code?
Randall
Michael Bayer wrote:
> you should use this to get at the column:
>
> col = s1.corresponding_column(col)
>
> of course trac is down so nothing is happening too soon at the moment.
>
> On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Randall Smith wrote:
>
>
>>Attached is a proposed patch.
>>
>>Randall
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
