Michael Bayer wrote: > On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:50 AM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > > > I understand this like this: > > > > SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) can implement SQLObject (Active Record) > > SQLObject (Active Record) cannot implement SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) > > " > > I recommend you read Fowler's book if youre looking for an academic > dicussion of data mapper vs. active record: > > http://www.martinfowler.com/books.html#eaa
I think it's clear that I'm neither looking for book-tips, nor for an academic discussion. I'm just looking for: a) a simple confirmation of a statement: "To avoid the technical issues involved the complication can be summarized as: SQLAlchemy implements the Data Mapper pattern, of which the Active Record pattern (which SQLObject implements) is a subset." http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-September/359164.html b) a simple confirmation of my conclusion: > > SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) can implement SQLObject (Active Record) > > SQLObject (Active Record) cannot implement SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) . -- http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/Persist --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
