I'll send you a copy as soon as the basics work. For now, the system is in place but only ManyToOne work. I wanted to also implement the 3 possible types of inheritance before publishing my code, but well, now the circumstances are different... I'd be very glad if we could mix both code bases.
FYI, the main difference in my code is that I don't defer classes, I only defer fields, and create them as soon as what is needed for a particular field is defined. So I had to implement a very simple "dependency system"... It felt like a better approach but I'm not really sure about it... Gaëtan. On 11/1/06, Daniel Haus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's very good news, maybe we can pull together the > best pieces of both approaches? I'd really like to see > your solution. > > Daniel > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
