it would slow down the lookup of classes to mappers, for one thing,
since id have to search through the __mro__ of each class to find a
corresponding mapper (we dont attach the mapper directly to the class
by default).  you probably want to make an inheriting mapper in this
case, and not specify a table for the inheriting mapper.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to