Sure Martin, Basically the answer is no, DISTINCT isn't available there.
However, the SelectResults extension turns out to have sorting and filtering functions that can be used to further refine the query in ways not possible with a regular select_by(). It did the job for me and has a nice interface. Recommended. Rick On 11/19/06, Martin Kaffanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But please tell us here what was ansered, because I think on 'searching > google' people which have the same question could find an answer here. > > Martin > > Am Sonntag, den 19.11.2006, 07:52 -0800 schrieb Rick Morrison: > > please ignore, this was answered in IRC > > > > On 11/17/06, ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is it possible to specify a DISTINCT option to select_by()? > > Couldn't > > find it in the docs. In general, what select() options does > > select_by() > > take, if any? > > > > Thx, > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
