Ο/Η Michael Bayer έγραψε: > django was not available to the public until it was fully functional > (youd go to the site and just get a "coming soon"-style splash > page)..and even then it was already in production use in earlier forms. > they knew that if you release something that wasnt polished and would > lead to user frustration, people would get disinterested and leave. > the strategy seems to have worked for them.
I understand your elaborations. You should possibly close "sqlalchemy", too - until it's fully functional and does not frustrate users. Same for turbogears and other open source projects (like django, which is still not fully functional, mainly due to it's deficient ORM layer). Or you can keep the development _open_, thus users and other developers can review the _source_ and contribute ideas, requirements, code etc.. > its not your grandfather's open source community ! Please leave relatives out of the discussions. . -- http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/Persist --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
