On Tue, 2007-30-01 at 18:57 -0500, Michael Bayer wrote:
> you can probably get away with it by just creating a Table with the
> view name and view columns as Columns inside the Table. reflection
Yes. I found this on one of the mailing lists.
I wanted something on which I could do:
v = View( ... )
v.create()
but I can do it via SQL for now.
>
> is generally not available, someone would have to make the effort to
> implement that for all the database modules.
Ahh ... I see.
Ok. tqvm
>
> On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>
> >
> > Will there eventually be a 'View' in the SQLAlchemy API, like 'Table'.
> >
> > I have been trying to find an example but 'view' tends to hit MVC
> > references in google searches.
> > --
> > --gh
--
--gh
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
