Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> I added distinct() to selectresults as a method and made the
> unit test a little clearer (since i dont like relying on the
> selectresults "mod")...
>
> q = sess.query(Department)
> d = SelectResults(q)
> d =
> d.join_to('employees').filter(Employee.c.name.startswith('J'))
> d = d.distinct()
> d = d.order_by([desc(Department.c.name)])
>
>
...and...
>
> for the order by getting removed during the select, that
> seemed to be an optimization that got stuck in there and
> since this is a really fringe use case its never come up, so
> i removed it and added your test case (only with
> distinct=True) in rev 2301.
>
I think you're slipping - I had to wait a whole three and a half hours
for this fix ;-) Seriously, thanks again,
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
