Hi, Well, more than improving the quality of the article, we need to make a case for it being "notable". The main criteria for this is:
"Software is notable if it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the software's author(s)." So, can we pick out two such examples? Off the top of my head, perhaps the "Rapid Web Application with TurboGears" is one (need to check). Can someone think of a second? Any magazine articles mentioned SA? Online magazines would be ok, but notes in personal blogs probably won't cut it. Paul On 2/14/07, Hamish Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I recently created a basic Wikipedia entry for SQLAlchemy: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLAlchemy > > However it has been marked as being non-notable: > > "An editor has expressed a concern that the subject of the article > does not satisfy the notability guideline or one of the following > guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia ... If you are familiar with the > subject matter, please expand the article to establish its notability, > citing reliable sources. If notability cannot be established, the > article is more likely to be considered for deletion, per > Wikipedia:Guide to deletion." > > Is someone able to make the necessary modifications to get the article > through review? > > Hamish > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
