You say "defined manually... automatically." It can't be both. :)
SA won't try to guess what properties you want on your mapped classes, because it could guess wrong. (Believe me, whatever pattern you are thinking of, someone could find an exception where automatically setting it up is not the right thing to do.) Explicit is better than implicit... On 2/16/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On 16. Februar 2007 17:09:12 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SA provide reflection support through Table(...autoload=True). Is there > > some extension for SA to include reflection support for relations? > > Otherwise you have specify the relationships using the 'properties' on > > your own. > > > > Sorry for this weird posting. Of course the mapped class > should obtain the additional properties as defined manually through > 'properties' automatically from the knowledge of the relations of the table > instance. > > -aj > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
