On 3/10/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well initial response to this post has been overwhelmingly low, but > thats fine with me. After trying to tackle this today, I realized > that I actually didnt want to add a brand new query object and go > through a painful deprecation procedure again and all that...and I > also observed that the notion of a query being against a single entity > is pretty important..things like get(), load() and all that dont make > much sense for multiple entities. Also, all the things Ive wanted to > do are not actually that hard as we already have code to do most of > it. > > So I did not add any new classes or modules, no new methods on > session, I didnt go with my modified "generative" approach (its just > like it always was) and changed absolutely nothing about Query thats > already there (well one little thing i dont think anyone was using). > But I added a whole lot of new methods to Query, essentially > everything SelectResults was able to do. I was concerned about having > just too much crap on Query but i think it turned out fine. Plus I > added a little bit of hibernate-like capabilities to query multiple > entities and extra columns too.
Well, this is just Great ! I also felt those methods belonged in the core somehow. Thanks for all your work! -- Gaëtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
