Sorry for the delay ;-) No objections. I was just trying to figure out
what was happening. (didn't get at first that "module selection is a
bit ugly" also meant that it didn't work if you specified the module)
But you already have a patch it seems. I'll try and test it out.
Steven
On 15 mrt, 15:43, "Rick Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, Stephen, I replied too early; your second email arrived before the
> first. A whole day before the first.
>
> So until we get a real cleanup, you're looking to try modules in this order:
>
> ['pyodbc', 'adodbapi', 'pymssql']
>
> Sounds OK to me -- any objections out there?
>
> Rick
>
> On 3/14/07, Rick Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's the second case, that is, it "sniffs" out what modules are installed.
> > As I said before, this
> > (along with other modules that effectively do the same thing), is up for a
> > clean-up soon, see ticket #480.
>
> > Rick
>
> > On 3/14/07, polaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > {'pyodbc': use_pyodbc, 'adodbapi': use_adodbapi, 'pyodbc':
> > > > use_pyodbc}.get(module.__name__, use_default)()
>
> > > Sorry, should be pymssql instead of pyodbc twice, but I guess you got
> > > that...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
