Gaetan, Thanks for your response. I'd like to follow up with two questions:
1. I understand what you mean about the current way I'd have to model this relationship in Elixir. This would allow me full control over the intermediate table, which means I could put my 'priority' field in it. However, I believe this will also prevent me from getting 'all Bs for a given A, in "priority" order', by simply accessing the correct property in an A. Instead, when accessing that property, I could get all occurances of the intermediate table for an A. Can you give me some idea of how I would set up a select that would give me all Bs for an A, in 'priority' order? 2. When you talk about 'Now on the SQLAlchemy side', it makes me thing that in addition to setting up the relationships in Elixir as you specified, I would also need to do something directly in SQLAlchemy. Is that what you meant, or am I misinterpreting you? Finally, I do hope you will add the capability for finer-grained control over the intermediate table of a many-to-many relationship to Elixir. I would think that this kind of ordered many-to-many relationship is a prevalent enough use case to warrant it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
