#545 is all by itself. ants was going to put in the "CASE" idea last we spoke.
On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Rick Morrison wrote: > Hey where are we with this? Does #476 fix #545, or are they > unrelated? What is the current behavior in 0.3.7 with an empty IN() > list? > > > On 4/21/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Ants Aasma wrote: > > > > > I'll try to create a test suite for it next week, I have already > > identified most of the test cases. Should I attach it to #476 or > > create a new ticket? > > Ive created ticket #545 and assigned to you. I may be putting out > 0.3.7 today or tomorrow, once i determine the state of the trunk is > OK, so this fix may or may not be in this release depending on timing. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
