On Jun 1, 11:57 pm, "Mike Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is, if the second number is lower than the first, shouldn't
> SQLAlchemy transform it into a query that returns no records? I.e.,
> LIMIT 0, which MySQL at least allows. Because that's what the Python
> equivalent would do:
>
> >>> range(9999)[1420:20]
> []
this is like the argument with the empty in_() clause. i like to err
on the side of "no silent failures / assumptions". but i lost the
argument with the in_() clause, so im willing to lose the argument
here. even though i really think python should be raising an error
here too...why doesnt it ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
