On Monday 02 July 2007 00:45:18 Eric Ongerth wrote: > Well, there ought to be more Bravos and Congratulations on this > thread. I only held back figuring others would pile on well > enough. Or maybe most of the polymorphists out there are gleefully > silent about what they're brewing up. > > Thanks for the insight. Wish I'd thought of it earlier too. > Funny, though; only three weeks after this came up, I'm replacing > most of my more complicated uses of polymorphism with more of a > 'vertical tables' approach.
can u explain a bit to one of the "polymorhists" :-) i mean, i dont give a shit if its polymunion or else, i just want my class tree to go into sql and then get it back sanely. so far i see that if i have inheritance A-B-C-D, this approach works; but if i have A-B-C and B-D, or A-B-C and A-D-E, i can't see how. or i am not understanding something? ta svil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
