I'd want to make sure this didn't hurt performance first. (Seems
innocuous enough, but if it's in any sort of inner loop the extra hash
lookup might be noticeable.)
On 7/27/07, svilen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> one suggesstion / request.
>
> As your changing everything anyway, can u replace all important {} and
> dict() with some util.Dict, and set() with util.Set?
> util.Ones can point to dict/set.
> The reason is so they can be further globally replaced by user with
> OrderedOnes, for example to achieve repeatability - tests etc.
>
> example ones are:
> MetaData.tables
> unitofwork.UOWTransaction.dependencies
> unitofwork.UOWTask.objects
> mapperlib.Mapper.save_obj(): table_to_mapper = {}
> mapperlib.Mapper._compile_properties(): self.__props = {}
> sqlalchemy.topological.QueueDependencySorter.sort(): nodes = {}
> these give 90% repeatabliity, but i could not make it 100%. )-:
>
> On Friday 27 July 2007 07:36:50 Michael Bayer wrote:
> > Hey ho -
> >
> > after around 400 revisions the 0.4 branch is merged to trunk:
> >
> > http://svn.sqlalchemy.org/sqlalchemy/trunk
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
