Hi, pyodbc + direct win32com calls to do table reflection. To make support more solid, we would need to move to adodbapi (and fix problems with adodbapi). Interestingly, you get more functional SQL through the ADO interface than the ODBC interface. At the moment it's plenty functional enough for me though.
More info on the wiki, http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/DatabaseNotes Paul On 8/7/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi paul - > > thanks much for this ! are we using pyodbc for this ? > > > On Aug 5, 7:20 pm, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just committed Microsoft Access support in the 0.4 branch. It's > > pretty basic (e.g. a lot of unit tests fail) but it does have functional > > table reflection. For me, this is a big help in migrating legacy Access > > databases to newer formats. > > > > The table reflection is based on jet2sql.py by Matt Keranen, which has > > been a real help. > > > > I've included some info on Access support on the wiki, > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/DatabaseNotes > > > > Enjoy, > > > > Paul > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
