On Wednesday 31 October 2007 17:51:09 Michael Bayer wrote: > also am considering taking save()/update()/save_or_update(), which > are hibernate terms, into just "add()". maybe ill put that in > 0.4.1. why not save() - having the 'save_or_update' meaning? would anyone need the new explicit save() - which actualy has the meaning of 'add'? maybe rename the explicit one as add() and rename save_or_update as save... these are more talkative names to me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
