I think it's a good idea, if Mike agrees then I will submit a patch to
do this later today. (Except MyClass.my_prop and my_prop_name won't be
equiv, you'll have to have whatever your property returns support
__eq__)

On Nov 20, 4:37 am, "Gaetan de Menten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I have some classes with "standard python" properties which target
> another python object and also uses several columns in the database. I
> also got a global factory function to create an instance of that
> target object out of the value of the columns (the class of that
> target object can vary).
>
> Now, I'd like to use those properties in filter criteria, as so:
>
> session.query(MyClass).filter(MyClass.my_prop == value)...
> session.query(MyClass).filter_by(my_prop_name=value)...
>
> I've tried using composite properties for that (passing the factory
> function instead of a composite class), and it actually works, but I'm
> a little nervous about it: can I have some bad side effect provided
> that in *some* cases (but not always) the target object is loaded from
> the database.
>
> I also dislike the fact I have to provide a __composite_values__ on
> all the possible target classes, while in my case, I would prefer to
> put that logic on the property side. I'd prefer if I could provide a
> callable which'd take an instance and output the tuple of values,
> instead of the method. Would that be considered a valid use case for
> composite properties or am I abusing the system?
>
> I've also tried to simply change those properties to descriptors so
> that I can override __eq__ on the object returned by accessing the
> property on the class. This worked fine for "filter". But I also want
> to be able to use filter_by. So, I'd wish that
> query(Class).filter_by(name=value) would be somehow equal to
> query(Class).filter(Class.name == value), but it's not. filter_by only
> accepts MapperProperties and not my custom property.
>
> So what do people think?
>
> --
> Gaƫtan de Mentenhttp://openhex.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to