On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> yes and no, as i said i'm replacing the __dict__ with something
> special; so
> its IA riding on top of me (;-) but otherwise its that. no renaming,
> i dont
> want someone (thats can be me, later) to be able to workaround
> either me or SA.
then have your magic __dict__ implement the same "save committed on
change" behavior as the attributes package. and of course test on
every SA release since youre welded to internal behavior:
def my_magic_dict_set_something(dict, key, value):
if key not in dict['_state'].committed_state:
dict['_state'].committed_state[key] = _the_old_value
dict[key] = value
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
