On Jan 8, 11:13 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Eoghan Murray wrote: > > > > > On Jan 8, 7:28 pm, Jonathan Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Eoghan Murray wrote: > >>> Ideally this would be expressed as: > > >>>>>> MyTable.filter(MyTable.c.MyColumn.in(ls)) > > >> Try: MyTable.filter(MyTable.c.MyColumn.in_(ls)) > > >> Just a guess. No time to see if this is right. > > > That produces the following strange SQL where clause: > > WHERE MyTable.MyColumn = ARRAY['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] > > version 0.4 ? if on version 0.3 use in_(*list)
Thanks, the list unpacking works like a treat - Also, after upgrading from 0.4.0beta6 to 0.4.2 there is no need for the unpacking - excellent! This would be a great example to give in http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlexpression.html#sql_operators because it's cool and that trailing underscore might prevent people (me) from discovering it. Eoghan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
