Michael Bayer wrote: > All of the crazy mappings today are blowing my mind, so I'll point > you to an old unit test with a doubly linked list:
Yeah, trust me, it was blowing my mind as well, so I elected not to go this direction anyway. You're also correct that there isn't _really_ a need to maintain the "previous" anyway, since it can be implied from the "next" a heck of a lot easier. The simplest solution is usually the best, and this one definitely wasn't very simple! On to other ideas... -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
