On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
> OK this issue is actually limited to "transient" objects only; that > is, if you had flushed your session before doing the merge() it > would have worked. The fix is in r4104. Im considering putting out > 0.4.3 today as a mostly bugfix release but have not decided yet. > to clarify, i meant, if in your test case you were merge()ing Biosequence/Annotation objects which were already persistent from a previous flush(), that alleviates the bug. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---