On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:

> OK this issue is actually limited to "transient" objects only; that  
> is, if you had flushed your session before doing the merge() it  
> would have worked.  The fix is in r4104.  Im considering putting out  
> 0.4.3 today as a mostly bugfix release but have not decided yet.
>

to clarify, i meant, if in your test case you were merge()ing  
Biosequence/Annotation objects which were already persistent from a  
previous flush(), that alleviates the bug. 
  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to