Heh, I have the opposite problem, I now find myself typing "in_" and "==" in interactive query editors....
On Feb 13, 2008 3:40 AM, Glauco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Bayer ha scritto: > > On Feb 11, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Glauco wrote: > > > > Hi all, > What's the simplest way for do a simple: > > select * from myTable where id in (1,2,3); > > > > I've solved this by using Subquery but final qry isn't pretty as > this one. > > > mytable.select(mytable.c.id.in_([1,2,3])) > > > Thank you michael, i've lost the "in_" operator. > > > Glauco > > -- > +------------------------------------------------------------+ > Glauco Uri > glauco(at)sferacarta.com > > Sfera Carta Software(R) info(at)sferacarta.com > Via Bazzanese,69 Casalecchio di Reno(BO) - Tel. 051591054 > +------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
