On Apr 1, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Bobby Impollonia wrote:
> > Awesome, putting use_alter on one of the foreign keys fixed the > problem. > > Would it be hard to just assume that when there is a circular > dependency that one of the keys should be use_alter'ed? Is there > actually a case where that be the wrong thing to do (or any reason I > would care which of the keys is the one to have use_alter)? it can be done but we'd have to modify the TableIterator to detect cycles and then place this constraint. Im a little uncomfortable with that since using ALTER requires that you name the constraint explicitly, and we never generate names. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
