On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > btw, if Mike is about delving into all this now, i think i have some > time to look around it, at least move onto with_polymorphic. if you're going to deal with future functionality, go work with the user_defined_state branch for now, which will soon be merged to trunk as 0.5. The internals of with_polymorphic are again highly modified there. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
