>If I add a simple "correlate" feature to Query in 0.5, you can use the >raw Table object to bypass the ORM meaning of "Dataset" and "Base". >the query above is not quite complete but I can get an approximation >like this:
Is this functionality available currently or am I waiting for sqlalchemy 0.5? If I try the above constructs I am getting AttributeError: 'PGCompiler' object has no attribute 'mapped_table' > > So I think going forward, the concept of "use the Table objects > directly" when you want to bypass the higher level meaning of > "Dataset.id", i.e. that its selecting from a join of Dataset and Base, > might be a good way to go with this. Is there a branch (or trunk) that I should be using Thanks, Kris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
