In reality it isn't error and looks that using:
     ', '.join(["%s=%r" % (key, getattr(self, key))

it's better since that you know easily the data type, althought it
shows a large text for date/datetime.


On Jul 13, 3:20 pm, Kless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solved, if it's used
>     ', '.join(["%s=%s" % (key, getattr(self, key))
>
> instead of:
>     ', '.join(["%s=%r" % (key, getattr(self, key))
>
> On Jul 13, 2:14 pm, Kless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It fails with fields of date. It shows:
>
> > created_at=*datetime.datetime(2008, 7, 13, 13, 59, 57)*
>
> > On Jun 21, 7:25 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > that __repr__ is pretty tortured too; a typical ORM-agnostic approach  
> > > is:
>
> > >      def __repr__(self):
> > >              return "%s(%s)" % (
> > >                  (self.__class__.__name__),
> > >                  ', '.join(["%s=%r" % (key, getattr(self, key))
> > >                             for key in sorted(self.__dict__.keys())
> > >                             if not key.startswith('_')]))
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to