On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so far i've used "all" and it seems to work for one single owner, but > i havent really tried the multiple case. the whole thing seems to me > like a splitted reference-counting mechanism, one side being weakref, > other not. its not going to work for multiple owners since cascades dont take backrefs into account. m2m "cascade" is not a met use case here as it has more ambiguous behavior and complexity, and is something you'd have to roll yourself. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
