Hey guys We're looking for a database-agnostic ORM package to build the standard Concordance database classes on. This requires Py3 support. http://concordance-xmpp.org/
Yes, yes, there aren't many DB packages for Py3 yet. This is exactly why we're looking for something that's database-agnostic; right now we're limited to sqlite but preferably our classes shouldn't care what database is being used and can just as readily be used with postgres or mysql in the future. This is a chicken-and-egg problem that will only be solved when existing Py3 code can take advantage of postgres py3 bindings. We have already ported Genshi to Py3 to the extent that it works for our purposes, hosting our transformed branch on http://hg.concordance-xmpp.org/genshi-py3 Two of us spent a good deal of time last night banging out the wrinkles left in sqlalchemy post-2to3, reducing the number of errors reported by alltests from 2000+ to just over 100. All our patches can be seen at http://hg.concordance-xmpp.org/sqlalchemy-py3 applied against a mirror of your hg mirror. Clearly we're not done yet but we've whittled down to the last few pieces. While we don't mind hosting this branch until you're ready to officially support Py3 it'd be nice to have all this work in a form that you can readily pull in and use. What can we do to help with that, and toward a near-future sqlalchemy release of a -py3 versioned tarball. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
