When we tried that it made a sql query to get all the towns (towns are loaded lazily) - that could be an awful lot of information, so this would be a much faster query
On Sep 19, 4:33 pm, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote: > On Sep 19, 2009, at 10:19 AM, joeformd wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the speedy response Michael, > > > we came up with this: > > > current_user_has_town = bool(session.query(User).filter > > (User.id==current_user.id).filter(User.towns.contains > > (current_user)).count()) > > > which maybe has slightly clearer intent? > > if you already have the current_user, why not just say "town in > current_user.towns" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
