Michael Bayer wrote:
as far as implementation this feature isn't on
my personal radar, so if you really want anytime soon you should provide a
patch, which I can of course help with.
Cool, it is on my radar, but sadly pretty far away :-(
you know, doing the "metaclass" approach is probably the first part of doing the
"demarcated mixin" approach.
here it is: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/DeclarativeMixins
Indeed, it'd just be great if the default declarative base mixin handled
this demarcation package already ;)
I argue about the comment on relations on that page, if the relation is
identical, it might well make sense to abstract it out and put it in the
mixin...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
