On Mar 27, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Chris Withers wrote: > Hi Again, > > I'm also curious about use of dict_ versus getting from cls in > _as_declarative. IIRC, at pycon, you changed it so that DeclarativeMeta > passes the class's __dict__ as dict_ and then made it so that only dict_ is > consulted for attributes.
I did that, I thought, because you requested that it work that way. I don't remember why you wanted it like that. > > However, _as_declarative intrinsically needs to futz with cls for things like > __mapper__, __table__ and __tablename__, which, iirc, was always retrieved > from cls, even before the declarative mixins stuff was done. > > I'm wondering why _as_declarative doesn't just take a cls and it then get > everything from the cls itself? *shrugs*. > > I remember backwards compatability for some use that Grok makes of this, but > it should be a one-liner for them to change and 0.6 would seem like a good > boundary to do it... we should probably spend 5 minutes looking at Grok to see if there's some reason for this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
