On Sep 7, 2010, at 2:16 PM, David Gardner wrote: > First wow thanks, I have a lot of polymorphic structures, so I am sure this > will be a huge benefit. > > Second, is create_session() being deprecated, or are there plans to deprecate > it in the 0.7 branch? > How soon should I start considering removing create_session() from my code?
There's no hurry with create_session(), but the defaults of sessionmaker()/Session() are pretty much the mainstream behavior now, even for our tests, so create_session doesn't really have a clear purpose. So yeah it may get a deprecation warning for 0.7 if I have the time to search and replace it out of all of our tests that still use it. Its not a priority though. > > On 09/07/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: >> - The Session class is now present in sqlalchemy.orm.*. >> We're moving away from the usage of create_session(), >> which has non-standard defaults, for those situations >> where a one-step Session constructor is desired. Most >> users should stick with sessionmaker() for general use, >> however. >> >> > > -- > David Gardner > Pipeline Tools Programmer > Jim Henson Creature Shop > dgard...@creatureshop.com > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
