The tweetscape is so far 9-2 on this one in the past two hours with one additional vote I'd qualify as split, so the change is up and you can see it at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/07/core/events.html http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/07/orm/events.html On Dec 30, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Tamás Bajusz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> > wrote: >> the twitterstream is leaning a lot towards not having the "on_", we'll see >> what happens as the day goes on. > > PyQt4 uses "on_" too. > http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/static/Docs/PyQt4/pyqt4ref.html#connecting-slots-by-name > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
