On Jul 9, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > You have on your side that the proposed behavior does seem like its probably > more correct. I have a patch forthcoming that does the basic idea but I'd > need to think of some more tests, consider how / if it might be optional, etc.
okey doke I have something kind of doing it at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2213, I'd need to stare at this a while longer and add more tests, try some profiling, etc. > > > > >> >> Ben >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sqlalchemy" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
