heh :) the thing about tests is that anyone who gets a couple of days of practice writing them in our style can be very productive...but everyone has just "one issue" they need so that threshold isn't passed ...
I have a boatload of tests to write for the 0.7.4 milestone so I'll be blocking out a day sometime soon to plow through a bunch. On Nov 16, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Alex Grönholm wrote: > Yeah my bad, the original query does indeed query for (Z.id, B.name). I had > just changed it to A.name to get the printout for the "workaround" query and > forgot to change it back before pasting here. > If there's something I can do to contribute (not sure I'm qualified to write > those tests), do tell. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/lGxM13xQhu8J. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
