On Jan 6, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Manav Goel wrote: > Hello > I noticed that in filter method I can use either > and_(condition1,condition2) > or > condition1 and condition2 > > But I searched and did not find any mention about second way anywhere. > > I want to know if both options are equal or there some catch in using second > option.
hoping you mean "&" and not "and". There's a docstring for and_() and variants here: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/core/expression_api.html?highlight=and_#sqlalchemy.sql.expression.and_ > > Regards, > Manav Goel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
